Federal agents arrested Peewee Longway in Georgia in September 2024, marking the start of a sweeping case. This case quickly placed the rapper under serious legal pressure. Prosecutors later outlined a five-count federal indictment tied to alleged drug distribution and firearms violations. In filings, they claimed a studio associated with Longway contained roughly 3,000 fentanyl pills, along with six firearms. Additionally, they said additional weapons were recovered at his residence. The government also pointed to what it described as “compelling evidence tying defendant to a transaction involving 4 kg of meth, which was trafficked through the studio.” Investigators further referenced text messages they say support allegations of coordinated drug activity. This added weight to a case that carried the potential for a decades-long sentence if fully prosecuted. Court documents cited by Complex indicate Longway accepted a plea agreement on April 1. He pleaded guilty to two federal charges: Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances and Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon. Under the deal, prosecutors agreed to recommend a sentence of up to 14 years in federal prison. Meanwhile, his defense agreed not to push for anything below 10. The arrangement significantly narrowed the range of possible outcomes compared with the original indictment. Feds are auctioning off PeeWee Longway’s jewelry smh pic.twitter.com/iiw4KHWi65 — THUGGERDAILY ひ (@ThuggerDaily) May 6, 2026 Longway Awaits Sentencing as Federal Case and Asset Seizures Continue Sentencing is scheduled for July 9, when a judge will decide the final term within that window. Longway remains in custody as he awaits that hearing. A separate federal case in Georgia tied to him continues to move forward with few publicly available updates. In a separate development, authorities have also begun disposing of assets connected to the investigation. Reports indicate that several pieces of Longway’s jewelry were seized and later auctioned by the federal government. Individual items sold for thousands of dollars as part of ongoing forfeiture proceedings.

Kim Kardashian is reportedly stepping away from her legal studies following a setback in her journey to become a licensed attorney. According to TMZ, Kardashian, 45, has decided to postpone future attempts at the California bar exam until at least 2027. The decision comes after the “Kardashians” star reportedly skipped the February administration of the rigorous test and does not plan to sit for the upcoming July exam. While Kardashian spent years documenting her legal aspirations on her Hulu reality series. The California bar exam is widely considered one of the most difficult professional licensure tests in the United States. While Kardashian has only sat for the full bar exam once, her path to that point was marked by persistence. Kardashian took the First-Year Law Students’ Examination, colloquially known as the “baby bar,” four times before successfully passing in 2021. “I failed this exam three times in two years, but I got back up each time and studied harder and tried again until I did it,” Kardashian said following her 2021 success. This determination initially fueled her transition into more advanced legal coursework, though the difficulty of the final bar exam has proven to be a more formidable hurdle. Insiders close to the Skims founder said the latest failure “broke her confidence,” leading to the current hiatus. Kim Reportedly Takes a Break: Despite the pause, Kardashian has not officially retired from her quest to follow in the footsteps of her late father, Robert Kardashian, who was a prominent defense attorney. Her legal work has already made a tangible impact on the American justice system; she has been a vocal advocate for criminal justice reform and has successfully lobbied for the clemency of several non-violent offenders. California is one of the few states that allows individuals to become lawyers through a “law office study program” rather than attending an accredited law school, provided they apprentice under a judge or attorney.

Chris Brown has moved to distance himself from a security incident at his Tarzana residence, a situation that resulted in one member of his team losing his job. According to TMZ, the guard involved in the confrontation is no longer employed following his arrest. Police confirmed that the individual had been working as part of Brown’s security detail but has since been dismissed. The episode, which unfolded late last week, remains under investigation. Accounts of what occurred vary in detail but point to a tense encounter outside the property. Reports indicate that a woman arrived without prior notice, something sources say happens with some frequency at the home. The situation escalated when she declined to leave, leading to a confrontation with security. It has been alleged that she attempted to drive toward the guard, prompting him to fire his weapon. The woman later contacted authorities, alleging that her vehicle had been targeted, and the guard was subsequently arrested on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon and vandalism. Brown Pushes Back as Music and Tour Plans Take Center Stage Brown addressed the growing speculation in a statement shared on Instagram, pushing back on claims that tied him directly to the incident. “AT THIS POINT THIS PATTERN IS OLD. I’m looking at the news like the rest of yall wondering when and where the hell this happened. I been in my rib this whole time. Ain’t heard a gunshot, police car or anything. DONT ATTACH MY NAME YO NONE OF THIS BULLSHT. I got sht to do!” The incident comes at a time when Brown is otherwise focused on new music and touring plans. He has recently revealed the tracklist for his forthcoming album, “Brown,” which is scheduled for release this week. The project follows his single “Fallin” featuring Leon Thomas and arrives ahead of the planned Raymond & Brown tour with Usher, a collaboration expected to draw significant attention across major venues.

M.I.A. fired back at critics and tour organizers on Monday following her reported removal from Kid Cudi’s “Rebel Ragers Tour” after a string of controversial on-stage political statements. The 50-year-old rapper and singer, born Maya Arulpragasam, took to social media to defend her actions during a performance in Dallas, where audience members alleged she made divisive comments regarding immigration and political affiliations. The controversy began Sunday night when concertgoers shared videos of the “Paper Planes” singer addressing the crowd. Reports from the Dallas show indicated that M.I.A. allegedly declared her support for the Republican party and pointed at various individuals in the audience, suggesting they were “illegal.” She then reportedly claimed she could not perform her 2010 track “Illygal” because of their presence. In a response written largely in all caps on social media, M.I.A. accused her detractors of gaslighting and “virtue signaling.” She clarified that her comments regarding visas were directed at her own team’s travel status and her own history as a London-born artist of Sri Lankan Tamil descent. “I started this intro to the song with the statement saying I’m illygal,” she said, adding that her lyrics have long advocated for marginalized groups before such causes were considered trendy. M.I.A SPEAKS: “I have no apology for the judgmental and wicked and the ignorant,” M.I.A. said. She urged her followers not to become “agents of division” and characterized the backlash as an attempt to erase her personal history and activism. The singer further noted that she has fought battles for immigrant rights for decades, citing her songs “Borders” and “Paper Planes” as evidence of her long-standing commitment to the subject. The removal marks a significant shift for the Rebel Ragers Tour, which was featured as a high-profile collaboration between Kid Cudi and the veteran avant-pop artist. Removing M.I.A from the tour follows a series of increasingly vocal political endorsements from M.I.A., including her expressed support for Donald Trump. The artist concluded her defense with a religious appeal, stating that her pride remains with those who fight against injustice. “Jesus returns to lead the world justly because there is injustice in this world,” she said. The tour is expected to continue with a revised schedule, though it remains unclear if a replacement opening act will be named for the remaining dates.

In the long arc of West Coast rap, The Game has occupied a complicated place—widely respected for his craft, yet often debated in the court of public opinion. His early work, including The Documentary, helped define a generation, and peers such as Drake have continued to acknowledge his influence. More recently, his name surfaced again amid speculation surrounding Drake’s forthcoming project, ICEMAN, with reports suggesting quiet conversations about possible collaborations. Still, admiration within the industry has not always translated into consistent public goodwill. Moments of friction have lingered. During the widely watched dispute between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, some fans questioned The Game’s positioning, particularly after he did not appear at a high-profile Los Angeles event tied to the moment. That absence fueled online conjecture, adding another layer to an already complex reputation. For some listeners, those episodes reinforced long-standing perceptions shaped by earlier disputes, including his highly publicized split from G-Unit more than two decades ago. View this post on Instagram Old Feuds Resurface as The Game Stays in the Spotlight That history resurfaced during a recent club performance in New York, where The Game addressed the past directly. “I got kicked out of G-Unit,” he told the crowd. “I’m just a f*cked up n***. Somebody tell Fif I’m here.” The remarks, pointed and unfiltered, left parts of the audience uncertain how to respond. Online reaction followed quickly, with some viewers urging the artist to move beyond a chapter they see as long closed. Even so, his musical ability remains largely undisputed. At a time when attention can shift quickly, The Game’s catalog continues to speak for itself, and the possibility of new work—whether alongside Drake or on his own—keeps him within the conversation.

The jury weighing the case against NFL wide receiver Stefon Diggs began deliberations Tuesday afternoon in Norfolk County District Court in Dedham, Massachusetts. This came after a second day that centered on sharp exchanges between prosecutors and defense attorneys. The case turns on allegations that Diggs assaulted his former live-in chef, Jamila “Mila” Adams, on December 2, 2025. The alleged assault occurred at his home in a Boston suburb. Adams testified that Diggs entered her bedroom and struck her with an open hand before placing an arm around her neck in what she described as a choking incident. She told jurors she struggled to breathe. Prosecutors have presented her account as central to the case. They argue it reflects a pattern of escalating conflict inside the household. The defense, however, pushed back forcefully. Attorneys for Diggs told jurors there were no eyewitnesses, no medical records, and no contemporaneous documentation of injury. They also introduced video clips of Adams in New York shortly after the alleged incident. In those videos, she appears smiling and dancing. Defense counsel Andrew Kettlewell told the jury, “There was not a single shred of credible evidence” supporting the assault allegation. Testimony also focused on the timing of Adams’ police report, which was filed on Dec. 16, 2025. This was more than a week after the alleged confrontation. She later pursued charges, leading to Diggs being formally charged on Dec. 29. Prosecutors countered that Adams’ emotional testimony should be considered in full context. This includes her dual role as employee and former romantic partner. No Injuries Observed as Stefon Diggs Assault Trial Advances On the witness stand Tuesday, Diggs’ chief of staff, Janelle Sales, said she observed no injuries or disturbance. A nurse and massage therapist testified they saw nothing unusual during treatment. Meanwhile, an accountant said Adams had been overpaid by $2,500. A celebrity stylist added that Adams previously threatened legal action over wages but did not allege abuse at the time. Diggs has pleaded not guilty to felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault. He faces up to five years in prison if convicted of the most serious charge. Judge Jeanmarie Carroll instructed jurors repeatedly to focus only on relevant evidence as they began deliberations. Once a Pro Bowl receiver with the Minnesota Vikings and Buffalo Bills, Diggs signed a $69 million deal with the New England Patriots before being released following a knee injury-shortened season. He remains a free agent as the case proceeds.

A fatal hit-and-run that took the life of Robert Maraj has now moved through the courts to a quiet legal conclusion. This comes years after the crash first drew public attention. The driver involved, Charles Polevich, previously served jail time after pleading guilty in connection with the incident and related charges. In the civil case that followed, the family pursued accountability through a wrongful death claim. That lawsuit, brought by Carol Maraj, has now been resolved. Court filings reviewed by TMZ indicate the matter was settled in March. However, the agreement’s financial terms have not been disclosed. The claim centered on damages tied to loss of companionship. It also focused on the broader emotional impact of the sudden death. The path to settlement included a contentious legal maneuver. Polevich sought to subpoena Nicki Minaj, attempting to question her under oath as part of his defense strategy. His filings suggested that her lyrics could be used to argue she had described a difficult upbringing and a strained family environment. He hoped this approach might reduce potential liability in the civil case. The request was ultimately not granted. Settlement Ends Years-Long Case, but Loss Still Lingers for the Maraj Family Without that testimony, the case proceeded in a more conventional direction. It ended in a negotiated resolution rather than a public trial. Polevich had already completed a one-year sentence tied to hit-and-run and evidence-related charges by the time the civil matter concluded. For the Maraj family, the legal process stretched across years marked by loss and repeated court filings. While the settlement brings closure in a procedural sense, it arrives against the backdrop of a deeply personal and enduring absence. Nicki Minaj has not publicly commented on the settlement’s outcome. In addition, no further court actions are expected at this time.

Nick Cannon revealed that his teenage son, Moroccan, can date but his twin sister, Monroe, is not allowed. Appearing on The TMZ Podcast on Saturday, May 2, Cannon explained  “double standard” rules of dating for his 15-year-old twins that he shares with Mariah Carey. “My son [Moroccan] has been dating, and I’ve allowed it, I encouraged it,” Cannon said. “And my daughter…” “I hope you’ve been allowing it and encouraging that, too,” the podcast host responded. “No, absolutely not,” Cannon responded. “First of all, it’s absolutely a double standard… And I know I get in trouble a lot ‘cause I say things with my chest,” Cannon continued. “But there is a difference when parenting a son and then when parenting a daughter.” Cannon said that his daughter needs more protection. “I am more protective of my daughter because there [are] things out there that I have to protect my daughter from,” he said. “Like, as we know, there are a certain type of individuals that you want to keep your daughter away from.” “If somebody puts their hands on my daughter, I’m going to jail,” he added. “And if some man puts his hands on my daughter, it’s my worst nightmare because I am going to jail forever.”   Cannon went on to explain the deal he made with Monroe. “We made a deal. If she can explain to me what’s going to happen on these dates, then she can go,” Cannon said. ” ‘Your twin brother can go with you.’ That’s what I do. But you ain’t going one-on-one with no little bastard anywhere.” As he’s “preparing Monroe for college,” and he’s fully aware, “it’s out of my control there.” “I can’t do nothing about it,” he continued. “Hopefully, we’re having these open conversations. My daughter tells me any and everything, and even though I’m apprehensive, like, if you can explain it to [me] … I want you to have all the questions answered or whatever, and you make the best decision possible.”

Lil Baby has entered 2026 in a position that feels both familiar and contested. The release of The Leaks gave some listeners a sense of return, pointing to elements of his earlier sound that first drew a wide audience. Others, however, have questioned whether his recent output reflects enough change to keep pace with a genre that rarely stands still. Even with that divide, his commercial presence remains steady, and his collaborations continue to carry weight for newer artists seeking visibility. At the same time, attention has begun to shift toward Drake and his forthcoming album ICEMAN. The project arrives after a period of visible tension within the rap landscape, particularly following Drake’s public conflict with Kendrick Lamar. That context has led to speculation about who might appear on the album and which past alliances will carry forward. Lil Baby entered that conversation over the weekend with a gesture that quickly circulated online. He posted a photograph of himself standing before a door covered in Drake’s image, pairing it with a brief caption: “I Already Picked My Side.” The message was direct, though its tone left room for interpretation, and it drew a mix of amusement and approval from fans reacting to its bluntness. “I Already Picked My Side” — Lil Baby via IG pic.twitter.com/qJIlrPKUvu — Kurrco (@Kurrco) May 3, 2026 Feature Talk Swirls as ICEMAN Plans Remain Unclear The post also prompted renewed discussion about whether the rapper could appear on ICEMAN. Drake has a history of adjusting tracklists late in the process, leaving open the possibility of additional features. Some listeners have expressed interest in hearing new voices on the project, while others remain receptive to familiar pairings. For now, the question remains unresolved. When ICEMAN is released, its final lineup will offer a clearer sense of how current relationships are reflected in the music. Until then, Lil Baby’s brief statement has ensured his name remains part of the conversation surrounding one of the year’s most closely watched releases.

Kid Cudi’s current Rebel Ragers tour has largely been framed as a high-energy return to the stage. However, a recent stop in Texas shifted the conversation in an unexpected direction. The tour, which included M.I.A. as a recurring guest, drew renewed attention after a moment that quickly moved beyond music. What unfolded inside the venue soon traveled online. As a result, audience recordings circulated widely and prompted broader discussion. In the hours that followed, the focus turned from performance to tone and from entertainment to accountability. During the May 2 show at Dos Equis Pavilion in Dallas, M.I.A. addressed the crowd with remarks that blended personal reflection with political commentary. “I’ve been canceled for many reasons. I never thought I would be canceled for being a brown Republican voter,” she said. She then added, “I can’t do ‘Illegal,’ though some of you could be in the audience.” The comments were met with a mixed response in the moment. Furthermore, there was a sharper reaction once clips began to spread across social platforms. As the backlash grew, attention shifted to how the tour’s headliner would respond. Cudi, who has often emphasized creating a welcoming environment at his shows, moved quickly. In a public statement, he explained that expectations had been clearly communicated before the tour began. He also said that those boundaries had not been respected. The decision that followed brought an immediate change to the lineup. UPDATE: M.I.A. has been booted off the rest of the tour. https://t.co/H0qHHKp8zn pic.twitter.com/58axYD9lbD — Dobson (@ByDobson) May 4, 2026 Kid Cudi Removes M.I.A. From Tour After Fan Backlash “TOUR UPDATE: M.I.A is no longer on this tour. I told my management to send a notice to her team before we started tour that I didn’t want anything offensive at my shows, cuz I already knew what time it was, and I was assured things were understood. After the last couple shows, I’ve been flooded with messages from fans that were upset by her rants. This, to me, is very disappointing, and I won’t have someone on my tour making offensive remarks that upsets my fanbase. Thank you for understanding. Rager.” M.I.A. has not publicly responded.