Mya does not like the sound of her voice from her earlier recordings. Speaking with PEOPLE about the 25th anniversary of her classic album, Fear of Flying, Mya said she doesn’ listening to much of her old music. “I don’t really listen to a lot of the old music because I like my voice now,” Mýa shares. “It’s very cringey to me because I sound like a kid.”  “I get very emotional when I hear my younger voice because of all that was endured,”she continued. Mya recalled being a teenager when she launched into supertardom. “I was just a baby when I started fresh out of high school,” Mýa said. “The Grammw-winner ssfound herself in “a position where the world is looking at you.” Mya shared that she’s on continual “journey of self love.” “I am so enamored by the journey because sometimes it takes 25, 27, 30 years to come into who you’re going to be for the rest of your life And that’s where I am now,” Mýa said. “I’m still growing and evolving every few years — every six months, sometimes.” Mya also said that she’s navigated the ebbs and flows of the business and is doing better than ever, “I’m just truly proud of myself for withstanding so much. The industry’s changed, the world’s changed,” Mya said. “I’ve kept my sanity in the process,  while my art and my craft continue to get better. The world has yet to receive the best of Mýa.” Mýa believes that all she endured made the woman and artist she is today. “All of that was necessary to become the best musician, the best songwriter, the best person,” she explained. Released in April 2000, Fear of Flying was a platinum-selling commercial success that established Mýa as a major force in early 2000s R&B and Pop. The album featured “Case of the Ex (Whatcha Gonna Do)”, which became a massive international hit, alongside other charting singles like “The Best of Me” and “Free.”

Martin Lawrence recently showed up big as a dad, gifting his daughter Iyanna Faith a sleek 2026 Porsche Macan wrapped in an orange ribbon, parked ready and waiting for her outside. The surprise was all dressed up—black-on-black finish, luxury SUV styling—and Iyanna, now 24, stepped into what she declared “This is my dream!” as she climbed into the driver’s seat and thanked her dad and everyone behind the scene. View this post on Instagram A post shared by HOT 97 (@hot97) Lawrence, known for his roles in film and comedy, had enlisted a high-end exotic car dealer, one that’s worked with big names, to pull off the delivery. He even relaxed in the back seat of his own Rolls-Royce Cullinan, grinning as he witnessed Iyanna’s reaction. For her, it was a moment of pure joy: she explored the console, flicked through menus, and clearly soaked in the moment. While the exact version of the Macan wasn’t revealed, the entry-level model starts at around $64,600 in the US with a 2.0-liter turbo four making 261 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque. If it’s the higher-performance GTS variant, you’re looking at about 434 horsepower from a 2.9-liter twin-turbo V6 and a starting price in the $93,000 range. Whether Iyanna’s ride is base model or high tier, the expression on her face said everything. For Martin Lawrence, this wasn’t just a flashy gesture—it was a clear statement of support and pride. He’s the father of three daughters and has often spoken about being present in their lives. By making this moment happen, he’s added another memorable chapter to his role as dad, showing that his “Bad Boy” screen persona doesn’t define him at home.

Comedian Alex Thomas recently reflected on his unexpected role in one of hip-hop’s biggest feuds. Back in the early 2000s, Thomas became part of 50 Cent’s legendary track “Back Down,” where he voiced the flamboyant caller who mocked Ja Rule. The skit closed out the diss record that helped solidify 50’s dominance during his battle with Murder Inc. and marked a major moment leading up to his debut album Get Rich or Die Tryin’. Thomas explained that the opportunity came through Dr. Dre, who had already worked with him on the 2001 film The Wash. After filming wrapped, Dre approached him about doing something new in the studio. He played Thomas an audio clip of a man calling into a radio station asking for Ja Rule, which became the inspiration for the skit. “I didn’t know who 50 Cent was,” Thomas admitted, recalling that he had no idea how serious the feud between 50 and Ja Rule really was at the time. He recorded the bit on the spot, finishing the job in about thirty minutes and earning ten thousand dollars for his time. Dre later surprised him with a pool table as a gift. However, Thomas’ name was purposely left out of the credits to make the prank sound real and keep fans guessing. “They wanted people to think it was an actual call,” he said. Over time, the moment grew into a piece of hip-hop history, though it caused some tension between Thomas and Ja Rule. The comedian insists there was no personal malice behind the performance, saying it was just business and part of the creative process. Looking back, he calls it a wild but unforgettable experience that connected comedy and rap in an unexpected way.

During the Super Bowl LVI halftime show at SoFi Stadium, Eminem commanded the stage with his signature intensity. Beyond the performance, however, the rapper’s publishing company, Eight Mile Style, has stepped into a high-stakes legal battle with Meta. The case concerns alleged unauthorized use of his music across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. In May 2022, Eight Mile Style filed suit against the social media giant. The lawsuit highlights what the company describes as repeated exploitation of Eminem’s catalog without proper licensing. The lawsuit asserts that “Meta is one of the most valuable companies in the world.” It accuses the corporation of leveraging its size to pressure smaller challengers. Attorney Richard Busch emphasized the imbalance of power: “Meta may effortlessly start and then endure a war of attrition. This is in order to force a smaller opposing party into submission.” According to the filing, Meta allegedly used 243 of Eminem’s compositions for user-generated content, copying, syncing, and streaming videos without proper authorization. Each incident, the documents suggest, reflects a disregard for the legal and creative rights of artists. The Battle Over Artistic Control On April 25, 2024, Eminem appeared at the NFL Draft in Detroit. This served as a reminder of his enduring influence. Meanwhile, the legal case continues to unfold, aiming to address the use of his work in millions of social media videos without consent. Meta’s claimed access to the music stems from a 2020 agreement with digital rights facilitator Audiam. This agreement is now under scrutiny in court. Eight Mile Style casts the litigation as part of a larger fight against corporate overreach: “Meta’s years-long and ongoing infringement … Is another case of a trillion-dollar company exploiting the creative efforts of musical artists.” The company is seeking both financial damages and a permanent injunction to prevent future unauthorized use of Eminem’s catalog.

Drake has been named, along with the online casino Stake and streamer Adin Ross, in a second class action lawsuit. New plaintiffs from New Mexico have joined earlier claimants in Missouri. They assert that Stake operates an illegal gambling enterprise disguised as a “social casino.” According to details reported by Casino Beats, plaintiffs allege that Stake’s supposed social gaming is merely a front. The platform uses a dual-token system in which non-redeemable “Gold Coins” generate redeemable “Stake Cash.” The conversion occurs at a one-to-one rate with the U.S. dollar. Critics describe the setup as a “virtual clone” of a traditional casino. Both Drake and Ross are accused of profiting substantially from promoting the platform, reportedly making millions annually. Plaintiffs argue that their influence on younger audiences normalizes gambling, portraying high-stakes betting as aspirational entertainment. Drake, Ross Accused of Promoting Gambling to Youth The lawsuit raises concerns about social responsibility, stating, “[Stake] threatens the welfare of Missouri residents and especially its young people.” It further contends that Drake’s involvement amounts to an implicit endorsement. As a result, it glamorizes gambling for millions of fans. The filing also claims that Stake provides “house money” to Drake and Ross. This suggests that publicized losses are carefully staged promotional tactics. Drake has yet to comment publicly on the allegations. Adin Ross, however, has dismissed the claims in a social media post, calling the lawsuit “bullsht” and urging followers to examine the documents themselves. “It’s fcking bullsh*t…,” he said, expressing frustration at what he described as misleading accusations.

After four seasons of crime, culture, and chaos, BMF has officially been canceled by Starz. Starz confirmed that BMF will not return for a fifth season, bringing the hit drama’s run to a close. The series was inspired by the real-life rise of the Black Mafia Family in 1980s Detroit. The hit show first premiered in 2021 and quickly became one of the network’s most-watched shows. Season 4, which recently wrapped, ended on a major cliffhanger, leaving fans with more questions than answers about the fates of Demetrius “Big Meech” Flenory (played by Lil Meech) and Terry “Southwest T” Flenory (Da’Vinchi). 50 Cent, who served as executive producer through his G-Unit Films & Television banner, didn’t hold back after the news broke. Instead of releasing a traditional statement, the media mogul took to Instagram with a meme showing actor Lil Meech holding a sign reading “Out of Work.” View this post on Instagram A post shared by 50 Cent (@50cent) He captioned the post: “What next season, lil n*a?” — a blunt jab that immediately sparked online buzz. Fans flooded the comments, half-laughing, half-lamenting the loss of one of Starz’s most popular franchises. View this post on Instagram A post shared by 50 Cent (@50cent) Despite the show’s cancellation, 50 Cent hinted that this might not be the last we see of BMF. He’s previously teased potential spinoffs or standalone projects connected to the universe, similar to how his Power franchise expanded into multiple successful series after its original run ended.Given the show’s cult following and cultural impact, industry observers wouldn’t be surprised if BMF continues in some form — possibly under a new network or streaming platform.Fan Reactions

As Lil Durk prepares to stand trial, a dispute over jury anonymity has emerged as one of the case’s defining issues. Prosecutors have asked that jurors’ identities remain hidden, citing safety concerns amid the rapper’s high-profile status. But Durk’s defense insists that secrecy in the courtroom risks eroding the public’s trust in the judicial process. Durk’s attorney, Drew Findling, challenged the proposal in a legal filing. He warned that it could prejudice jurors before the trial even begins. “The adoption of an anonymous jury would compromise transparency and fundamental fairness, contradicting Mr. Banks’ presumption of innocence,” he wrote. Findling added that such a measure should be reserved only for cases where real and immediate threats exist. He argues these conditions are absent here. The Chicago-born rapper, whose legal name is Durk Derrick Banks, faces charges tied to an alleged murder-for-hire plot targeting fellow artist Quando Rondo in 2022. Prosecutors claim the altercation led to the death of Rondo’s cousin, Saviay’a “Lul Pabb” Robinson. Durk has maintained his innocence, calling the allegations unfounded. Findling argued that keeping juror identities completely sealed from the defense could distort public perception. It could also unfairly signal that his client poses a threat. While acknowledging that some protection might be necessary, he emphasized that the defense must have access to juror information to ensure fairness. “An anonymous jury,” he argued, “creates an inherent suggestion of danger that simply does not exist.” Durk’s team: juror secrecy unnecessary despite threats He also dismissed the prosecution’s reasoning as speculative, noting that concerns about media attention do not equal genuine risk. Findling underscored that Durk has no history of intimidating witnesses or jurors. He also has no affiliations with organized crime, framing the request as excessive and unnecessary. The prosecution’s push for anonymity stems from several reported threats allegedly made by Durk’s supporters. Officials claim that both a judge and a prosecutor were targeted in harassing phone calls. Some of the incidents were traced to individuals in the Central District of California. These developments, they say, justify tighter safeguards around juror identities. The trial is scheduled to begin on January 6, 2026, with prosecutors confirming they will not pursue the death penalty. Still, the court’s decision on juror anonymity could shape not only the proceedings but also the broader public conversation about fairness, fame, and the intersection of justice and celebrity.

The trial overseen by Judge Michelle Sisco took a sharp turn this week as she criticized the defense in the murder case of rapper Julio Foolio (real name Charles Jones) as “inexcusable.” The defendant, Alicia Andrews, faces charges of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder, and she is the first of five individuals charged in connection with the killing. Andrews’ trial centers around Jones’ death, which occurred in June of last year outside the Holiday Inn Tampa North parking lot. At issue this week was the defense team’s invocation of the sequestration rule—a court mandate that prohibits witnesses from receiving outside information about the case or discussing it among themselves. Prosecutors questioned whether the defense had only informed a single witness of the rule. Upon confirming this, the judge responded: “The failure of the defense to tell their own witnesses not to talk about the case is inexcusable, and that’s a matter of record.” Prosecutors allege that Andrews traveled from Jacksonville to Tampa with co-defendants linked to rival gangs, tailed Jones and aided the gunmen by providing his location. Meanwhile, Andrews’ attorney maintains she was simply on a trip with her boyfriend and had no connection to the shooting or the gang affiliates, arguing there is no physical evidence tying her to the crime. Tensions widened further when defense attorney Erian White raised concerns about the prosecutor’s behavior, calling it “unprofessional” and “disrespectful.” He said: “We are professionals, just like every other attorney in this courtroom. The bigger point that I was making is that the way that Mr. Harmon has been speaking to this side of the table is unprofessional, it’s disrespectful… The rise in tone is unnecessary, and it’s disrespectful, and it’s inappropriate.” The trial of Alicia Andrews continues, while separate proceedings for her co-defendants remain scheduled for next year.

Chris Brown commanded the stage at State Farm Arena during his “11:11” tour, delivering a performance brimming with energy and showmanship. Yet behind the applause and adoration, the singer faces an unfolding legal battle that has drawn widespread attention. Brown stands accused of assaulting a music producer at the Tape Club in the United Kingdom. According to The Mirror, Judge Tony Baumgartner recently modified Brown’s bail, permitting him to leave the UK and return to the United States, though strict conditions remain in place to ensure his eventual return for court proceedings. Prosecutor Heide Stonecliffe KC emphasized that the bail adjustment was granted under “unusual circumstances,” cautioning that it should not be interpreted as a relaxation of judicial oversight. Judge Baumgartner addressed Brown and co-defendant Omololu Akinlolu, stating, “You shall return to the US under the specified conditions of bail. Your return to the UK will be mandatory for court proceedings as required.” The directive underscores the court’s effort to balance Brown’s mobility with its responsibility to uphold legal accountability. Upcoming Trial Brown, who has pleaded not guilty, faces trial in October 2026. As the proceedings draw closer, the case continues to attract public scrutiny, with fans and media closely monitoring developments. In addition to his legal troubles, Brown has engaged in a public dispute with former collaborator Kevin McCall. On the Back On Figg show, McCall revealed personal financial difficulties and implied that Brown had not provided support. Brown responded sharply on Instagram: “Remember this: you can’t walk across a burnt bridge. And you know what’s funnier than a troll? A BROKE ONE.”

Sean “Diddy” Combs is taking decisive steps in his ongoing legal battle, filing a motion to accelerate the appellate process. This comes following convictions that have stirred national attention. The high-profile musician and entrepreneur seeks a swift resolution after being found guilty on two counts under the Mann Act. In a recent filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Diddy’s attorney, Alexandra Shapiro, emphasized the need for a compressed timeline. The motion argues that delays could result in Diddy serving a substantial portion of his 50-month sentence before an appellate decision is reached. The urgency underscores broader questions about the pace and fairness of the judicial process for defendants facing serious charges. On July 2, 2025, Diddy was convicted of two Mann Act violations. These laws prohibit transporting individuals across state lines for illicit sexual activity. He was acquitted of more serious allegations, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. These carried potentially harsher penalties. Sentenced by Judge Arun Subramanian on October 3, 2025, Diddy received a 50-month prison term, five years of supervised release, and a $500,000 fine. His legal team acted quickly, filing an appeal just five days after the formal judgment on October 15. This showed a clear sign of their intent to move efficiently through the court system. BREAKING: Sean “Diddy” Combs asks Appeals Court to fast-track his appeal.. Appellant’s Opening Brief and Appendix: due by December 23, 2025 Appellee’s Opposition Brief: due by February 20, 2026Appellant’s Reply Brief: due by March 13, 2026Oral argument: April 2026 pic.twitter.com/vuBVrGXpNL — Lauren Conlin (@conlin_lauren) October 29, 2025 Proposed Appeal Timeline Shapiro’s filing lays out a suggested schedule for the appeal: December 23, 2025: Appellant’s Opening Brief and Appendix February 20, 2026: Appellee’s Opposition Brief March 13, 2026: Appellant’s Reply Brief April 2026: Oral arguments before the Second Circuit The government has indicated no opposition, raising the likelihood of quick approval by the appellate panel. Diddy’s attorneys also highlight the effect of his 14 months of prior detention on the appeal’s efficacy. They argue that a standard appellate process, often exceeding a year, could render any favorable outcome moot by the time a ruling is issued. The team further notes that Diddy may qualify for programs under the First Step Act and Residential Drug Abuse Program (RDAP). This adds layers of complexity to his legal path. If the court approves the accelerated schedule, Diddy could see a decision by late 2026, potentially reshaping his legal status. Meanwhile, he remains in custody, awaiting the outcome of this pivotal fight.